Humans endure trauma, stress, accidents
and adversities in different ways. Some cope up with great intensity and some
succumb. From a Psychology perspective these are all "challenges"
that a person faces when an adversity hits them. Research shows that the
ability to cope up from these adversities depends on various factors including
genetic makeup of the person. The rising above the challenges reveal a person's
hidden abilities. Majority of the times the adversities changes 'self concept'.
None can understand what makes us endure and what we are capable of enduring.
The second class of benefit concerns relationships and the third common benefit
is that the trauma changes priorities and philosophies toward the present and
toward people.(1)
Drawing parallel to the psychoanalysis of
human trauma and adversities to corporates, corporates are not as
non-individualistic as we expect them and as they are portrayed legally.
Promoters have a great say in the way they run the organisation. The culture
and personal traits of individual promoters have a great bearing on the culture
that a corporate inculcates. Many corporates, especially when they are young as
start ups and are growing face with good number of adverse situations. These
adverse situations are related to the acceptance of the product, selling
processes, marketing effort, challenges with people, accounting methodologies
adopted and so on. The key lies in the way the man at the helm of the affairs
sits down and addresses these issues paves the way the corporate copes up with
such situations. Some promoters take the bull by the horns as they clearly see
that the issue can be fixed only by them and spend enough time in changing the
course of the corporate to come out of the situation.
Every organisation worth its name would have had a phase where
they face these adversities. The adversities and challenges once they are
endured and overcome make a strong organisation. People in the organisation
proudly talk of how they came out of the situation.
I remember reading the interview of Bharti Mittal some years back.
At that time he said that the biggest challenge they saw that was coming was
the launch of Reliance Telecom. Reliance with its deep pockets and marketing
effort captured the imagination of the people and market share. Airtel was
afraid of de-growth as it is yet to be present nationally and was only present
in pockets in various states. Once they saw through the phase of launch by
Reliance, they were able to redraw their strategy and come back strongly. It
was Mr.Mittal’s personal grit and determination that saw the organisation
through the adversity.
There are good number of start ups where the promoters had a tough
past. Some promoters went through rough patches in the previous businesses and
scraped through and in some cases promoters have lost everything and started
all over again and in some cases promoters made some money by selling the
earlier business after challenging years of running the business. In all the
cases, they exhibit fair amount of confidence and are extremely optimistic of
making it big. This attitude is what makes them cross the hurdles and face
challenges with determination. This endurance makes them look positive side of
the situation and rebuild.
In Indian context the post traumatic growth applicable to individuals is applicable to all organisations except for public sector companies. In these companies no individual can command and create a culture as much in privately held companies, thus making them succumb to the adversities than overcoming them in spite of the back up from the Government ownership.
Why some children are particularly vulnerable to adversity? Genes
guide brain development throughout childhood, but that development is also
affected by environmental context, and overall safety versus threat. Good
parenting can help tune up the attachment system to make the child more
adventurous; yet even beyond such effects, if the child’s environment feels
safe and controllable, the child will develop a more positive affective style,
and will be less anxious as an adult. But is the environment offers daily
uncontrollable threats, the child’s brain will be altered, set to be less
trusting and more vigilant.(2)
As I was chatting with few of the seed funding companies in a
conference, one of the statements made by them caught my attention. He said he
would like to bet on young team. It went against my intuition. When I dug deep,
I realized that there is something called “memory bump”, an autobiographical memory,
which is a recall of memory of a person between the ages of fifteen and twenty
five, is more prevalent in the age groups beyond thirty than the younger ones.
Younger teams take more risks, show more agility, fall back less on experience
and more on intuition and learn their way out of problems quickly.
More the cycles a startup goes through the make-measure-learn, the
more it is experienced to handle any adversities and correct the course of
action or overcome a hurdle. Therefore, constant evaluation of the external
environment and letting the team exposed to the facts is the best method to
ready people in the organisation for the challenges to come. So from a
suspecting mindset the organisation will successfully move towards sure footed
actions as they would evaluate before they start coming to conclusions. A sense
of less trusting and more vigilant behaviour among the team down the
organisation structure is helpful in one way or the other as the organisation
is made sure footed by weeding out various issues right from the ground
level.
It is the endurance of tough situations of
the leadership team that make the culture of the organisation which in turn is
capable of enduring changing and troubled situations. Such companies are more
capable of enduring and coming out of tougher situations they face in the
journey than the promoters who faced lesser challenges.
No comments:
Post a Comment